= |
Here R is the radius of the spherical quantum dot (QD). The three variational parameters are , and while N is the normalization. The systems under study were CdS and CuCl.
The authors consider the case of weak confinement (e.g. size R > aB, the bulk exciton radius). One would expect, from the work of Efros & Efros (1982), the energy upshift to go as
= |
where
M | = | m1 + m2 |
The authors try to extract M from the slope of vs. 1 / R2 but are unsuccessful. This failure led them to suggest that the QD must be modeled by a finite and not infinite potential depth. The authors also plot the oscillator strength as a function of aB* / R using the Henry and Nassau formula. This reveals a sharp rise as R is reduced. Over the years Prof. Rustagi's group has produced a series of papers employing both effective mass theory (EMT) and tight-binding (TB) methods.