1) Gravity,
Magnetic and Geodetic Survey Of Epicentral Area Of Bhuj Earthquake
Of January 26, 2001 And Hidden
Thrust Faults.
D.C.
Mishra, D.V. Chandrasekhar and B.Singh
National
Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
2) Litho-Atmo-Ionospheric Coupling In Seismic Processes.
Andrew Tronin
Scientific Research Centre
for Ecological Safety, Russian Academy of Sciences.
3) Constraints On The Rupture Mechanism Of The 2001 Bhuj Earthquake From Satellite Imagery.
Vineet K Gahalaut
1, 2 and Roland Bürgmann 1
1 Berkeley
Seismological Laboratory, McCone Hall, University of California, Berkeley,
CA-94720, USA.
2
National Geophysical Research Institute, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, India.
4) Definition
Of Seismic Moment At a Discontinuity Interface And Comparison of Seismological
And
Geodetic/Geological Estimations Of Slip And/or Rupture Length of An Earthquake.
Z. L. Wu [1 2 3]
1 Center
for Earth System Science, Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
100039 Beijing, China.
2
Center for Analysis and Prediction, China Seismological Bureau, 100036
Beijing, China.
3
Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Bureau, 100081 Beijing.
5) 26th
January 2001 Earthquake OF Gujrat, India Was Triggered By Change in Kp
And
Electron
Flux Induced by Sun.
Saumitra Mukherjee
Associate Professor (Remote
sensing) School Of Environmental Sciences ;Jawaharlal Nehru University.
6) The Micro-Satellite DEMETER.
M. Parrot
LPCE/CNRS, 3A Avenue de la
Recherche, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
7) Luminescence
Chronology Of Active Landforms Along Kachchh Mainland Fault.
George Mathew and A. K.
Singhvi
Physical Research Laboratory,
PGS-DN, Ahmedabad – 380 009, INDIA.
8) Fountain Effect Depression Before The Strong Earthquakes In Low Latitude Areas.
Sergey A. Pulinets1,
Manuel Hernández-Pajares2, Jann-Yenq Liu3, Anna D. Legen'ka4
1.Institute of Geophysics,
UNAM, México,
2.Universidad
Politecnico de Cataluña, Spain,
3.Institute of
Space Science, NCU, Taiwan, 4IZMIRAN, Academy of Sciences, Russia.
9) Possible
Utilization (Usage) Of Satellite Monitoring
Of Near-Earth Plasma For
PredictionOf
Strong Earthquakes.
V.I. Larkina
IZMIRAN, Troitsk town, Moscow
region, 142190, Russia.
10) Study
Of Fractal Geometry With Reference To The Tectonics Of Kutch Region In
Gujarat,
India.
Avadh Ram and P.N.S.Roy
Department of Geophysics,
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
11) Seismic
Tomography Structure And Tectonic Model Of The January 26, 2001 Bhuj
Earthquake
In Western India.
J.R. Kayal
Geological Survey of India
27, J.L. Nehru Road, Kolkata - 700 016.
12) Some
Electrical Charackteristics Of The Ozonosphere Over South Indiaand Their
Correlation
With Long-Term And Short-Term Solar Activity.
S.P.Perov 1, S.P.Gupta 2.
1.Central aerological
observatory, Moscow.
2.Physical Research Laboratry,
Ahmedabad.
13) Space Technology And Earthquake Prediction.
Zhonghao Shou
Darrell Harrington ,
Earthquake Prediction Center, 500E 63rd 19K, New York, NY 10021.
14) Preliminary Results Of The GPS Studies For The January 2001 Gujarat Earthquake.
Madhav N. Kulkarni
Indian Institute
of Technology Bombay, India.
15) Role Of Space Technology In Natural Disaster Management.
Shriniwas S. Arkatkar
Lecturer, Civil Engineering
Department, Nirma Institute of Technology ,Ahmedabad.
16) Is There Any Correlation Between The Sunspot Activity And Earthquakes?
R.K. Tiwari, S. Srilakshmi
and V.K.Somvanshi
Theoretical Geophysics
Group National Geophysical Research Institute Hyderabad (A.P.).
17) Earthquake
Induced Small Scale Geological Structures Developed During Kutch
Earthquake,Western
India, 26th, January 2001.
T. K. Biswal
Dept. of Earth
Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai.
18) Damage Pattern Due To Bhuj Earthquake (2001), India.
N. Bhandari
1 and B. K. Sharma 2
1.Physical Research
Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India.
2.Dpeartment
of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi-7, India.
19) Seismotectonics Of The January 26, 2001 Bhuj Earthquake Sequence.
REENA DE
Geological Survey
of India, Eastern Region, Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700 091.
20) Tomography
Of The Source Area Of The 2001 Bhuj Earthqauke: Evidence
For Fluids Below The Hypocenter?
Sushil Kumar1, Hiroaki Negishi2,
Jim Mori3, Tamao Sato4, Paul Boding5
and B.K. Rastogi6.
1.Wadia Institute of
Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun - 248 001, India.
2.National Research
Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention,
Tenno-dai
3-1, Tsukuba, 305-0006, Japan.
3.Disaster Prevention
Research Institute, Gokasho, Uji, 611-0011, Japan.
4.Hirosaki University,
Bunkyo-cho 3, Hirosaki, 036-8561, Japan.
5.Center for Earthquake
Research and Information, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152,
USA.
6.Nationl Geophysical
Research Institute, Uppal Road, Hyderabad - 500 007, India.
21) Ionospheric Effects Before Strong Earthquakes At Low Latitudes.
Ruzhin Yu.Ya.1, Depueva A.H.1,
Devi M.2.
1.Institute of Terrestrial
Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, IZMIRAN,
Troitsk,
Russia 142190.
2.Depatment of Physics,
Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014.
22) Mapping
the Liquefaction Susceptible Zones in Parts of Kachchh Region Using
IRS
– WiFS and LISS-3 Data.
D.Ramakrishnan 1,
K.K.Mohanty 2, S.R.Nayak2, A.Jeyaram 1.
1 RRSSC-ISRO, IIT Campus,
Kharagpur – 721302.
2.MWRD, Space
Application Centre, Ahmedabad-380015.
23) Variations
Of Electron Concentration In Mid-Latitude Ionosphere
Before
Strong Earthquakes
Liperovskaya
E.V.1, Parrot M.2, Rodkin M.V.3
1.Russia, Moscow,
123995, Institute of Physics of the Earth, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya,
10.
2.L.P.C.E./C.N.R.S.,
3 A, Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2,
France.
3. Russia,
Moscow, 117296, World Geophysical Center Data, Molodejnaya,3.
24) Neotectonic
Joints – Towards Understanding The Orientation Of Stresses That Build
Up
To Cause Large Magnitude Earthquakes.
Aniruddha S. Khadkikar
Geology and Palaeontology Groupn
Agharkar Research Institute G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune.
25) Radon Precursory Signals of Chamoli and Bhuj Earthquakes.
H.S. Virk, Vivek Walia, B. S.
Bajwa and Puneet Kumar
Department of Physics, Guru Nanak
Dev University, Amritsar-143005, India.
26) Release of Helium Associated with Bhuj Earthquake 2001
R.D. Deshpande, N.
Bhandari and S.K. Gupta
Physical Research Laboratory,
Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009, India.
27) Toward a Better Understanding of Non-Seismic Pre Earthquake Phenomena
Friedemann
T. Freund
SJSU/NASA Ames Research
Center, Earth System and Technology Branch
Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000.
28) Tec
Response Of The Shock-Acoustic Waves Generated During Rocket Launchings,
By
Earthquakes And Explosions.
Afraimovich,
E.L., E.I. Astafieva, N.P. Perevalova, and V.V. Kiryushkin
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
29) Searching
For Earthquake Precursors In Total Electron Content Variations In The Ionosphere
Using
Data From The Global Gps Network.
Afraimovich,
E.L., E.I. Astafieva
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial
Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
30) Searching For Earthquake Precursors In Vlf Signals.
Afraimovich, E.L.,
E.I. Astafieva, and N.N. Klimov
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial
Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
31) Geodetic
& Geophysical Studies Of Crustal Deformations And Fault Displacements
– A Case Study For Monitoring Deformations
In Kachchh Region Of Gujarat.
Dr.
Prithvish Nag1 and H. B. Madhwal2
1 Surveyor General of
India, Dehradun – 248 001
2 Deputy Director, Survey
of India, Dehradun – 248 001.
32) Disaster Management Support Framework With Space Inputs.
B. Manikiam
and S.K. Srivastava
Indian Space Research
Organisation, Bangalore, India
33) Deformation
Due To The Mw 7.7 Bhuj Earthquake Of 2001 And
Inferences
About Stress And Strain In The Kutch Region.
B.K. Rastogi and Prantik Mandal
National Geophysical Research Institute,
Hyderabad-500007, India.
34) Empirical,
Statistical, and Physical Approaches to the Prediction of the Behavior
of a Complex
System:
Study and Practice of Seismic Hazard Assessment and Earthquake Prediction
in China.
Wu Zhongliang 1 and Zhu Chuanzhen
2
1.Center for Earth System Science, Graduate
School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100039 Beijing,
China.
2.Institute of Geophysics, China
Seismological Bureau, 100081 Beijing, China.
35) Atmospheric Precursors Of Earthquakes Located Around Crete Island.
Yu.Ruzhin (1), V.Oraevsky (1),
C.Nomicos (2), F.Vallianatos (3)
1- IZMIRAN, Moscow, Russia;2- TEI of Athens,
Greece; 3- TEI Chania branch, Crete, Greece
36) Space Plasma Precursor Of Turkish Earthquakes From The Gps Data.
Ruzhin Yu.Ya., Oraevsky V.N.,
Shagimuratov I.I. and Andreevsky S.
IZMIRAN, 142190 Troitsk-town, Russia.
37) Presence
of large crustal strain around an asperity/heterogeneous body in the lower
crust beneath Kachchh:
A
Possible explanation for the occurrence of 2001 Bhuj earthquake sequence.
Prantik Mandal, B.K. Rastogi, H.V.S. Satyanarayana and M. Kousalya
38) Tectonic Evaluation of Dead Sea Fault System In Syria using Multi Data sets
Raed Ahmad
Syrian Ph.D. Scholar
Yerevan State University of Architecture and Construction, Yerevan_9,
Armenia
39) Ionospheric Perturbations Caused by Bhuj Earthquake
Birbal Singh, Raj Pal Singh,
Vinod Kumar Kushwah
R.B.S. College Bichpuri,
Agra
40) Complex Seismoelectromagnetic Monitoring Of The Baikal Rift Zone
E.L. Afraimovich1, E.I. Astafieva1,
N.N. Klimov2, V.A. Sankov2, A.V. Loukhnev2, Yu.B. Bashkuev3, A.V. Gatsutsev3,
M.G. Dembelov3, and A.V.
Dambuev3
1 Institute
of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
2 Institute
of Earth Crust, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
3 Physical
Problems Department of the Buryat Sientific Center, Russian Academy of
Sciences, Russia
41) Solar activity as a main factor of Global Change
Perov, S.(1); Subbaraya,
B.(2); Chakravarty, S (2).; Gupta, S.(3); Jayaraman, A.(3); Chakrabarty,
D.(3); Galkina, I.(1); Kruchenitsky, G.(1).
(1) Central aerological
observatory, Moscow; (2) Indian Space Research Organization, Bangalore;
(3) Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad
42) Near Source Ground Motion and Attenuation during the Kutch Earthquake
R.
N. Iyengar
Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore 560012.
43) Earth-atmospheric coupling during strong earthquakes by analyzing IR remote sensing data
Dimitar Ouzounov
NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center/SSAI, MS 902, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
44) The Dynamics and Geometry of the Indian-Eurasian Collision in Pakistan
Dietrich
Bannert
Moorstrasse, ISERNHAGEN, Germany
45) Study Of Elf/Vlf Signatures Associated With Earthquakes
A.K. Gwal1, Ankur Trigunait1, Kalpana Malhotra1 and M. Parrot2
1 Space Science Laboratory, Department of Electronics,
Barkatullah University, Bhopal-462026, India
2 LPCE/CNRS, 3A Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique,
45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
46) Ionospheric Signatures Linked To Seismic Activity
Ankur Trigunait1, A.K. Gwal1, Shivalika Sarkar1 and M. Parrot2
1Space Science Laboratory, Department of Electronics,
Barkatullah University, Bhopal-462026, India
2LPCE/CNRS, 3A Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique,
45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
47) Seismo-tectonics and Hazard Zonation study of Kachchh
K.K.Mohanty1,
Kanchan Maiti2, Pooja S Gupta3, Ramanuj Banerjee1, and S.R.Nayak1
1
Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad - 380015
2 Dept. of Applied Geology, Univ. of Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttaranchal
3 ME - III (Geotechnology), Faculty of Engg. &Technology, M.S.University,
Baroda
48) Automatic Assessment of Earthquake Damaged Area using Scale-space classification techniques
Neeraj
Mishra , P.Suresh Kumar, R.Chandrakanth2, R.Ramachandran and R. Krishnan
Advanced Data Processing Research Institute, Dept. of Space, Govt. of India,
Secunderabad.
M.G.Thakkar
Department of Geology, R. R. Lalan College, Bhuj, Kachchh-370 001, Gujarat
50) Utility of Magnetic data for studying the Earthquake Prone Bhuj Region
Mita
Rajaram, S. P. Anand and Vinit C. Erram
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005
51) Structure and Tectonic Framework of Kachchh
R.V.
Karanth
Department of Geology, M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara-390 002
52) Ionospheric
precursors of the Gujarat Earthquake of 26 January, 2001
H. Chandra
And Som Sharma
Physical
Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
53) Upwelling
of Kandla Port Prior to Bhuj Earthquake of 26th January 2001 and
Some
Other Seismic Precursors
Arun Bapat
Research
Seismological Consultant, India.
54) Local Site Effects Observed during Bhuj Earthquake
J. P. Narayan,
M. L. Sharma and Ashwani Kumar
Department
of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee,Roorkey-247667,
India
55) The
Bhuj Earthquake, 26 January 2001: Regional Lineaments and Their Differential
Effect On
Major
Settlements In Cambay Basin
A.S. Arya and Ajai
Forestry, Landuse and Photogrammetry Group Space Applications Centre (ISRO)
Ahmedabad - 380 015
Strachimir
Chterev Mavrodiev
INRNE, BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria
57) Causative Factors For Bhuj Earthquake Of 26th January, 2001 - A Holistic Approach
B. Ramalingeswara Rao and
Vijay Kumar Rao
National Geophysical
Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
58) Utility Of Multisensor Data For Early Warning Of Intraplate Earthquakes
R. P. Singh1, Sagnik
Dey1, Sudipta Sarkar2 and Menas Kafatos2
1 Department of Civil
Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology,
Kanpur
2 CEOSR, George Mason
University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
59) Monitoring of Geophysical Parameters for Seismic Surveillance
S L Varudkar1 and Arun Bapat2
1Marathwada Statutory
Development Board, Aurangabad
2Research Consultant,
Pune
60) Ground Motion Estimation from January 26, 2001, Gujarat Earthquake and its observation in Himalaya
S K Singh1, Kamal2 and B
K Bansal3
1Instituto de Geofisica
UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico, DF, Mexico
2Wadia Institute of Himalayan
Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun, India
3Department of Science
and Technology, New Delhi, India
61) Hydrologic Effects of the Bhuj Earthquake of January 26,2001--- Gujarat, India
R C Jain
Central Ground Water
Board, West Central Region,
Ahmedabad
62) DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (2001) USING IRS LISS-III AND PAN DATA
J R Sharma, A K Gupta,
G Sreenivasan and B K Bhadra
Regional Remote Sensing
Service Center, Department of Space,
CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur-342003
63) The earthquake influence on ionosphere dynamics and magnetic Sq-variation for Kamchatka
Kanonidi Kh.D ,
Ruzhin Yu.Ya., Osipov N.K.
IZMIRAN, 142190 Troitsk-town,
Moscow region, Russia
64) Geomagnetic Field Satellites and Earthquake Detection
J. R. Heirtzler
NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
K.K. Sharma and Ritesh Purohit
Government Post Graduate College, Sirohi, Rajasthan, India
Aishwarya Narain
Space Applications Centre
(ISRO), Ahmedabad, India
B.M.Vyas & R.
Pandey
Department of Physics,
Sukhadia University, Udaipur 313 001, India
68) A Study of Bhuj earthquake of January 26, 2001 and seismic activities in other parts of the region
A.K. Shukla, S.K. Srivastav, H.V.
Gupta, R.S. Dattatrayam, P.R. Baidya, Rajesh Prakash, H.P. Shukla, G. Suresh
and A K. Ghose
India Meteorological Department,
Lodi Road, New Delhi-11003
69) Seismo-tectonic perspective on the 1819 and 2001, Rann of Kachchh, Earthquakes
C.P. Rajendran and
Kusala Rajendran
Centre for Earth Science
Studies
Trivandrum 695031
70) Brightness Temperature Anomaly during Gujarat Earthquake using SSM/I data
N. Harijan1, Nitin Katiyar1,
Y. P. Singh1, Rahul Kanwar2, Dimitar Ouzounov3
and R. P. Singh1
1Department of Civil Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur - 208 016
2France
3NASA, GSFC - SSAI, Greenbelt,
Maryland - 20771, USA
71) Detection
and analysis of surface changes after Chamoli (March 29, 1999)
and Gujarat earthquakes (Jan. 26, 2001)
Using
IRS 1C/1D data
M. M. Kimothi & Navin
Juyal*
Space Applications Center,
Ahmedabad-15
*Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad